23rd
HE SAYS: A proposed alternative to “nagging”
Comments (View)It’s a carrot vs. stick scenario: even though negative reinforcement (i.e., nagging, yelling, unplugging the tv/computer/Xbox) will usually get more immediate results (i.e., he’ll get off his ass just to make the yelling stop), in general, people are always going to respond a lot better in the long run to positive reinforcement (i.e., encouragement, rewarding good behavior) than negative reinforcement.
I imagine the usual scenario that causes women to engage in the behavior men call “nagging” boils down to the following:
- Man says he (wants to | should | will) do something (e.g., clean, cook, fix something).
- Time goes by, and he doesn’t do the aforementioned thing.
- Even more time goes by, enough to frustrate the woman and cause her to wonder why he even said what he said in step 1 in the first place.
- Woman “reminds” man of what he said in step 1, usually somewhat vociferously due to her frustration in step 3.
- In response (or, as suggested above, to get away from) the “nagging,” the man goes off and does what he said he would do.
- Because the act of “nagging” achieved the desired result (getting the man to do what he said), the woman will likely resort to it in the future.
Now, yes, in most cases nagging will achieve immediate short-term results, but likely in a somewhat negative manner. The man will do what he is told only to make the nagging stop, not out of any intrinsic motivation or a desire for a positive result – he’s not chasing something desirable, he’s running from something undesirable.
In the long-run, if this pattern continues, he will only grow to resent her for always prodding her along; ironically, she probably thinks of herself as a positive force in his life, because she motivates him to change for the better. Well, men generally consider nagging the emotional equivalent of the whip or the cattle prod. Consider how the recipients of such “motivational instruments” generally feel about their bearers.
I don’t hear about it as often, but consider the inverse situation: one where the man nags the woman to do something she keeps talking about. The situation that comes to mind most readily – and one I imagine is likely to incite female readers – is the issue of working out (and the implicit issue contained therein: weight).
Almost every woman I’ve ever known has, at some point, complained (to me, to their friends, to the mirror even) about their weight or figure. Usually, this is followed with an assertion that, yes, they are going to work out more, starting tomorrow, or something to that effect. And while some women do, in fact, follow through on that assertion, inevitably, there are some that don’t.
And the next day, they’re back to looking at themselves in the mirror, complaining about their weight and figure, and saying that yes, they are going to the gym tomorrow to work it off.
Now, there is a general consensus among (most) guys that the smart thing to say in this situation is, well, nothing at all. (Smart guys know that she’ll know we’re lying if we say “no, you don’t have a noticeable belly at all,” and it’s considered a form of suicide to agree with the woman’s complaint about herself.)
But, of course, there’s going to be the guy that will get fed up with this cycle and “remind” the girl that she said she was going to start working out. Probably in a less than comforting tone, depending on how many times he’s seen her repeat the cycle, and how frustrated he’s become at her subsequent inaction.
Consider how she would react to his “nagging” in this situation. I imagine it would not go down well (for anyone involved) if he were to say something along the lines of: “God, you complaining about your weight every Goddamn day but you never do anyting about it, why don’t you just go to the gym already?”
She’s not going to take that well, because even though he is only trying to get her to do what she said she would do, he’s phrased it in such a way as to make it sound like an attack on her. And, when anyone feels like they’re being attacked, they’re going to respond either by becoming defensive, or by counter-attacking (or both).
Now, instead consider a more positive approach, something like: “Hey, maybe it would be fun if we started going to the gym together!” Or perhaps, offering to help her unwind after her workout with a backrub, or a home-made dinner.
As the old adage goes, you can catch more flies with honey. Well, in a *healthy relationship you can get better results with encouragement than with nagging.
*Addendum:
I should emphasize that this is the way to go in a healthy relationship. If, at the end of the day, the only way the woman gets a man to do anything is by nagging, that’s not going to be a positive thing for either of them.
No grown man wants to be treated like a child, and no woman wants to spend her life with an overgrown child of a boyfriend/husband. So, it’s harsh truth time:
- Men: If, despite your best efforts, she still resorts to treating you like a child all the time, maybe it’s time to consider the idea that a woman who only knows how to ask you do to things by yelling about them and belittling you might not be the best one for you. You don’t want to spend the rest of your life feeling like a kindergardner whose homework has been eaten by the dog. Also, if she keeps trying to change you, maybe she doesn’t really want to be with you, but the guy she thinks she can turn you into, and that’s just not going to go well.
- Women: If, despite your best efforts, he still cannot for the life of him get off his ass to do any of the things he says he’ll do, maybe it’s time to consider the idea that a man who can’t follow through on anything he says might not be the best one for you. You don’t want to spend the rest of your life with a man that you can only see as an overgrown kindergardner who keeps making excuses about his homework. Also, if you keep hoping that someday he’ll change, maybe you don’t really want to be with him, but who he might be, and that’s just not going to go well.

